Although the brains of students from
families above the poverty line do not seem as if they would be different from
those who come from families at or below the poverty line, differences do exist
due to poor nutrition, higher rate of substance abuse, and less prenatal
care. Poor nutrition for example, can have detrimental effects on a
child’s brain. Students’ thoughts could become detracted from lessons in
the classroom due to a preoccupation of where their next meal will come from,
or they may be unable to learn because of the pain from a hungry
stomach. As with any other organ in the body, poor or lacking nutrition
can have physical manifestations in the brain. If children are not
receiving the necessary care and nutrition in utero and during the early
developmental years, there can be lasting effects. Jensen (2009) explains
that, “Deficits in these areas inhibit the production of new brain cells, alter
the path of maturation, and rework the healthy neural circuitry in children's
brains, thereby undermining emotional and social development and predisposing
them to emotional dysfunction” (“Cognitive Lags,” para.2). However, as
teachers of all children from an extensive array of backgrounds and familial
situations, we can have a lasting impact of children from low-income
homes. As Smith and DeBord (2005) stated, “…it is essential that teachers
know the disadvantages under which these children live each day. In some
cases the school setting will be the first ordered environment the child has ever known.
A teacher can have a tremendous influence upon such a child” (“Family Resource
Practices,” par.6). Below you will find practical and beneficial
strategies for teaching children in poverty or those from low-income
homes.
Teaching
Strategies
In order to encourage more parents from
lower socioeconomic statuses to attend parent-teacher conferences, create
student buy-in and enthusiasm for this type of important events by hosting
student-led conferences at the end of grading periods. Be sure to also
include goal setting during these meetings to enable students to
have ownership over their own learning and progress.
Teachers can provide character lessons and
develop the social skills of their students. Since they are not
biological behaviors, teachers should explicitly teach learned emotional
behaviors such as compassion, acceptance, and social skills to their entire
class. Because children in poverty often have less interaction with
parents due to the adults working multiple jobs or being from single-headed
homes, they do not learn those behaviors we assume to be innate in other
students. Teachers can easily accomplish this by reminding students to make eye contact
when speaking to others, greet their classmates in a morning meeting, and thank
their classmates after completing group activities.
Since academic vocabulary is not as common
in low-income homes in comparison to the homes of more affluent students,
teachers should explicitly teach academic language. As Jensen (2009)
explained, “…low-income caregivers speak in shorter, more grammatically simple
sentences. There is less back-and-forth— fewer questions asked and fewer
explanations given. As a result, children raised in poverty experience a more
limited range of language capabilities” (“Cognitive Lags,” para.7). When
students do not know the language of academia, their success in school will
suffer, especially in the high school years and beyond. Less knowledge of
academic language could also prevent some students from entering or succeeding
in college, effectively preventing
them from breaking the cycle of poverty that can plague them.
Since language and life lessons can
be acquired through reading text, teachers should provide access to more books in the
classroom and even encourage students to take the books home. Since
reading can be a strong indicator of school success, teachers should provide
students with the access to books low-income families often do not have or
cannot afford their students.
In an effort to not exclude students or
cause shame or embarrassment, educators in the classroom should not host
activities such as gift exchanges. Teacher should account for the
inability of some students to participate in these types of situations.
Having students create valentines in class as a classroom project is another
way to still carry on the tradition of giving certain holidays are centered
around.
School personnel can create an environment
of college readiness (even in elementary school) to set all of their students
up for success. By providing students with an attitude geared toward
optimism and equal opportunity, students can be afforded the realization that
they do have the power to break generational poverty. This type of school
culture can also work to cultivate the positive attitude toward learning that
is often lacking in the homes of children in poverty.
When teaching content that requires
background knowledge, teachers need to assess their students carefully to
ensure the class has the required schema to continue learning
successfully. If students are lacking background knowledge, the
necessary experiences should be afforded to them so that they will have equal
access to the subject matter. An example of this is when students
are learning about counting money. Children living in low-income homes
may not have the experience of counting coins from a piggy bank at home.
In this case, providing students time to count and explore real coins or even
play money would be beneficial prior to beginning instruction.
Another example of how teachers can provide meaningful, real world
learning experiences would be to do class cooking projects to teach how to make
healthy snacks. This type of activity would also afford low SES
children an opportunity to learn about healthy eating, something that is
not as common in low-income homes.
Instead of sending projects home and
expecting them to be completed with or under the guidance of the adults in the
home, projects such as science fair projects or book reports can be completed
in class. Since there is traditionally less support at home for children
in low-income homes, these children should have access to these great learning
activities with support.
Teachers of children in poor communities
should include units on healthy eating, personal hygiene, and oral health since
poor children may not receive these important life lessons at home.
Schools could also help by inviting nonprofit organizations, groups, or
programs such as KidsSmiles to provide free or low cost dental care to families
who need it but may not be able to acquire it on their own.
Teachers of children will brains affected
by substance use and abuse, poor nutrition, lower instances of prenatal care,
and less community resources should help students develop appropriate emotional
responses instead of requiring the students to change their behavior on their
own. For example, instead of telling
kids to "be responsible” or “be respectful” teachers should demonstrate
appropriate responses and the circumstances in which to use them.
Students should also be allowed to practice applying them in class.
As Jensen (2009) stated teachers should:
Help students increase their perception of control over their environment by
showing them how to better manage their own stress levels. Instead of
telling
students to act differently, take the time to teach them how to
act differently by implement social-emotional skill-building programs in the
early years. Programs like the PATHS program, Conscious Discipline, and Love
and Logic embed social skills into a classroom management
framework. (“Effects
on School Behavior, para.9)
Teachers of children in poverty should
work hard to cultivate an inclusive classroom community that encourages a
positive relationship and affiliation with the school. Creating this
feeling of belonging will allow students from all walks of life to feel that
they belong and that their learning and growth does matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment